Re: [PATCH 0/3] SHA-256: Update commit-graph and multi-pack-index formats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> As discussed [1], there is some concern around binary file formats requiring
> the context of the repository config in order to infer hash lengths. Two
> formats that were designed with the hash transition in mind (commit-graph
> and multi-pack-index) have bytes available to indicate the hash algorithm
> used. Let's actually update these formats to be more self-contained with the
> two hash algorithms being available.
> ...
> If this is the way we want to go with the formats, then I'll assist
> coordinating these textual and semantic merge conflicts.

I agree that the files should be self-identifying, but have these
changes tested without sha256 hash?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux