On 2020-08-14 at 01:07:12, Junio C Hamano wrote: > There are still a handful mentions of SHA-1 when we meant the > (hexadecimal) object names in end-user facing messages. Rewrite > them. > > I was hoping that this can mostly be s/SHA-1/object name/, but > a few messages needed rephrasing to keep the result readable. All of these seem reasonable, and I think "object name" is fine for this purpose. -- brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature