Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > I offered three small suggestions how I think it could be improved, still, > but I would be pretty happy with seeing the patches moving to `next` > as-are. I tend to agree with those points I saw you mentioned. The unconditional exporting of the committer-date without undoing looked like a bad pattern waiting to be copied and pasted. I have not yet fully followed the codepath but I tend to agree with your suspicion that commit_tree_extended() might be a better place to do this. Thanks.
