Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: Fix possibly wrong onto hash in todo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Antti

On 11/08/2020 19:15, Antti Keränen wrote:
Hi Phillip and Taylor.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 04:32:37PM +0100, Phillip Wood wrote:
I'm not sure it's worth rearranging these lines. It probably does not matter
but we could do

+	char shortonto[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ + 1];

and then later call find_unique_abbrev_r() instead so we don't have to worry
about freeing shortonto.

I like this. I'll change the code, if the rest of the patch is okay.

Thanks great

Thanks

Phillip


Thanks for taking the trouble to add a test, I think all the lines above
could be simplified to

	GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR=cat git rebase -i HEAD~5 branch1 >actual

Nice! :) There was a test called 'todo count' which I mimicked. This
obviously is much cleaner solution, thanks.

we could lose the final .*

Ack.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:36:21AM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote:
Ack, I noticed this too during my review, but apparently forgot to
comment on it. I'm puzzled by the first '..*'. If you're searching for
any non-empty string, how about '.+' instead?

That's true. Good point. I pretty much copy&pasted the 'todo count' test
so I didn't give this much thought. I'll fix this.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux