On 8/11/2020 6:52 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote: > Add a null fetch negotiator. I understand the value of this negotiator. I'm concerned about using "null" as the name, since it has a clear relationship to zero-valued pointers and that's not what is happening. (My gut feeling starting the patch was that some function pointers would be NULL or something.) Instead, might I recommend "noop" or "no_op" in place of "null" here? Thanks, -Stolee
