Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2020, #02; Mon, 10)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sergey Organov <sorganov@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> * jk/log-fp-implies-m (2020-07-29) 7 commits
>>   (merged to 'next' on 2020-08-03 at 39fefa6b82)
>>  + doc/git-log: clarify handling of merge commit diffs
>>  + doc/git-log: move "-t" into diff-options list
>>  + doc/git-log: drop "-r" diff option
>>  + doc/git-log: move "Diff Formatting" from rev-list-options
>>  + log: enable "-m" automatically with "--first-parent"
>>  + revision: add "--no-diff-merges" option to counteract "-m"
>>  + log: drop "--cc implies -m" logic
>>
>>  Originally merged to 'next' on 2020-08-01
>>
>>  "git log --first-parent -p" showed patches only for single-parent
>>  commits on the first-parent chain; the "--first-parent" option has
>>  been made to imply "-m".  Use "--no-diff-merges" to restore the
>>  previous behaviour to omit patches for merge commits.
>>
>>  On hold a bit.
>>  cf. <20200804200018.GB2014743@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I believe I've submitted resolution for that.
>
> <20200805220832.3800-1-sorganov@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Do you expect anything from me to push all this further?

I was waiting for a reroll of the "resolution" with just one extra
test I mentioned in <xmqq3650n2rc.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> in the
thread.  With that everything would be good to go, I would think.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux