Antti Keränen <antti@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:36:21AM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote: >> Ack, I noticed this too during my review, but apparently forgot to >> comment on it. I'm puzzled by the first '..*'. If you're searching for >> any non-empty string, how about '.+' instead? > > That's true. Good point. I pretty much copy&pasted the 'todo count' test > so I didn't give this much thought. I'll fix this. Please don't shorten ..* into .+ if you are writing a portable sed script---stick to the BRE.
