On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:44:26PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with '-' are > only in 'seen' (formerly 'pu'---proposed updates) while commits prefixed > with '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of > the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them. I noticed that you picked up 'tb/bloom-improvements' in your fork, but that it didn't make it into the list of cooking topics below. I suspect that this is because of [1], where I got bitten by trying to sneak in an extra 'bitmap_free()' at the last moment. I have a fixup in [2] which needs to be squashed in at that point in the series, along with dropping a '&' in the last patch to squelch a compiler error introduced by the fixup. Do you want me to resend the whole series, or would you rather apply the fixups when queuing? Either is fine for me. > * tb/upload-pack-filters (2020-08-05) 4 commits > (merged to 'next' on 2020-08-05 at 918e7092fe) > + t5616: use test_i18ngrep for upload-pack errors > (merged to 'next' on 2020-08-04 at 3ae57cc90c) > + upload-pack.c: introduce 'uploadpackfilter.tree.maxDepth' > + upload-pack.c: allow banning certain object filter(s) > + list_objects_filter_options: introduce 'list_object_filter_config_name' > > The component to respond to "git fetch" request is made more > configurable to selectively allow or reject object filtering > specification used for partial cloning. > > Will merge to 'master'. > cf. <20200804003722.GA2726931@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, I'm glad that this made it in. Thanks, Taylor [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqbljoolhy.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200811134807.GA26715@xxxxxxx/
