Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] extend --abbrev support to diff-patch format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Đoàn Trần Công Danh  <congdanhqx@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Đoàn Trần Công Danh (2):
>   revision: differentiate if --no-abbrev asked explicitly
>   diff: extend --abbrev support to diff-patch format

It was not clear, at least to me at all, what these patches are
trying to achieve (i.e. what end-users appreciate) until I saw the
code change X-<.

The changes to fill_metainfo() make sense to me.  It just needs log
messages that explain the intent better.  They do not even make it
clear that they want to make the abbreviation length of the object
names on the "index $from..$to $mode" lines configurable.

Thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux