[PATCH v2 10/11] t642[23]: be more flexible for add/add conflicts involving pair renames

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>

Much like the last commit accepted 'add/add' and 'rename/add'
interchangably, we also want to do the same for 'add/add' and
'rename/rename'.  This also allows us to avoid the ambiguity in meaning
with 'rename/rename' (is it two separate files renamed to the same
location, or one file renamed on both sides but differently)?

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 t/t6422-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh | 18 ++++++++++++------
 t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh  |  4 ++--
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/t6422-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh b/t/t6422-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh
index f3929b65c0..3375eaf4e7 100755
--- a/t/t6422-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh
+++ b/t/t6422-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ test_expect_success 'handle rename/rename (2to1) conflict correctly' '
 		git checkout B^0 &&
 
 		test_must_fail git merge -s recursive C^0 >out &&
-		test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out &&
+		test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (\(.*\)/\1)" out &&
 
 		git ls-files -s >out &&
 		test_line_count = 2 out &&
@@ -959,11 +959,17 @@ test_expect_failure 'rrdd-check: rename/rename(2to1)/delete/delete conflict' '
 		git checkout A^0 &&
 		test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
 
-		# Not sure whether the output should contain just one
-		# "CONFLICT (rename/rename/delete/delete)" line, or if it
-		# should break it into three: "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" and
-		# two "CONFLICT (rename/delete)" lines; allow for either.
-		test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out &&
+		# Instead of requiring the output to contain one combined line
+		#   CONFLICT (rename/rename/delete/delete)
+		# or perhaps two lines:
+		#   CONFLICT (rename/rename): ...
+		#   CONFLICT (rename/delete): info about pair 1
+		#   CONFLICT (rename/delete): info about pair 2
+		# and instead of requiring "rename/rename" instead of "add/add",
+		# be flexible in the type of console output message(s) reported
+		# for this particular case; we will be more stringent about the
+		# contents of the index and working directory.
+		test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (\(.*\)/\1)" out &&
 		test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename.*delete)" out &&
 		test_must_be_empty err &&
 
diff --git a/t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh b/t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh
index 2b4a482277..f7ecbb886d 100755
--- a/t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh
+++ b/t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ test_expect_success '1d: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) conflict'
 		git checkout A^0 &&
 
 		test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
-		test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out &&
+		test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (\(.*\)/\1)" out &&
 
 		git ls-files -s >out &&
 		test_line_count = 8 out &&
@@ -1686,7 +1686,7 @@ test_expect_success '7b: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive rename'
 		git checkout A^0 &&
 
 		test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
-		test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out &&
+		test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (\(.*\)/\1)" out &&
 
 		git ls-files -s >out &&
 		test_line_count = 4 out &&
-- 
gitgitgadget




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux