Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] t: don't spuriously close and reopen quotes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I don't feel strongly about whether the series should be re-rolled.
> It's true that dropping that dead code (mentioned above) would make more
> sense coming before the patch which fixes up the quoting, but it
> wouldn't bother me if the dead-code removal was done as a follow-on
> patch.

Yeah, I agree that a preparatory clean-up followed by the main
change would logically make more sense, but if it is swapped it is
not the end of the world ;-)

Thanks, both.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux