Steven Grimm <koreth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm <koreth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Modified as suggested by Junio. Okay. Assuming that other people are happy with this version (I have to warn you that I haven't even attempted to apply this patch, let alone compiling yet), I'd prefer to keep our combined thought process in the commit log, so that we do not have to rehash this later, over and over again. Something along the following lines, perhaps...? After starting to edit a working tree file but later when your edit ends up identical to the original (this can also happen when you ran a wholesale regexp replace with something like "perl -i" that does not touch many of the paths), "git diff" between the index and the working tree outputs many "empty" diffs that show "diff --git" header and nothing else, because these paths are stat dirty. While it was _a_ way to warn the user that the earlier action of the user made the index ineffective as an optimization mechanism, it was felt too loud for the purpose of warning even to experienced users, and also resulted in confusing people new to git. This replaces the "empty" diffs with a single warning message at the end. When you see such a message, you know you did something suboptimal to your index; you can optimize the index again by running "git-update-index --refresh". The change affects only "git diff" that outputs patch text, because that is where the annoyance of too many "empty" diff is most strongly felt, and because the warning message can be safely ignored by downstream tools without getting mistaken as part of the patch. For the low-level "git diff-files", the traditional behaviour is retained. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html