Re: [PATCH 1/4] Use $(SHELL_PATH) instead of sh in Makefile.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 10:14 PM brian m. carlson
> <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2020-08-06 at 01:05:01, lufia via GitGitGadget wrote:
> > > In the not POSIX environment, like Plan 9, sh might not be looked up
> > > in the directories named by the $PATH.
> >
> > I think Git's editor handling assumes that sh is somewhere in the PATH,
> > so it might be fine for us to just ask the user to adjust PATH
> > appropriately before running make.  I don't have a strong preference; if
> > this works on a standard Unix machine, which it looks like it should
> > (although I haven't tested), I'm fine with it.
>
> This does, however, have a bit of a chicken-and-egg feel to it. The
> results of the "uname_FOO" assignments in config.mak.uname are
> consulted later in the file to _assign_ a value to SHELL_PATH on a
> number of platforms. So, making the "uname_FOO" assignments themselves
> depend upon SHELL_PATH is rather circular and confusing.

The problem is, Plan 9 APE's sh is placed on /bin/ape/sh by default.
By running /bin/ape/psh
APE commands existed under /bin/ape such as sh, uname, etc, will be
mounted on /bin.
In running of ape/psh, APE commands will prioritize than native commands.
So I've wanted to run /bin/ape/psh before executing some shell
commands by gmake.

----
kadota



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux