When applying a binary patch, as an optimization, "apply" checks if the
postimage is already present. During this fetch, it is perfectly
expected for the postimage not to be present, so there is no need to
lazy-fetch missing objects. Teach "apply" not to lazy-fetch in this
case.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
apply.c | 2 +-
t/t4150-am.sh | 16 ++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/apply.c b/apply.c
index 8bff604dbe..402d80602a 100644
--- a/apply.c
+++ b/apply.c
@@ -3178,7 +3178,7 @@ static int apply_binary(struct apply_state *state,
return 0; /* deletion patch */
}
- if (has_object_file(&oid)) {
+ if (has_object(the_repository, &oid, 0)) {
/* We already have the postimage */
enum object_type type;
unsigned long size;
diff --git a/t/t4150-am.sh b/t/t4150-am.sh
index bda4586a79..94a2c76522 100755
--- a/t/t4150-am.sh
+++ b/t/t4150-am.sh
@@ -1133,4 +1133,20 @@ test_expect_success 'am and .gitattibutes' '
)
'
+test_expect_success 'apply binary blob in partial clone' '
+ printf "\\000" >binary &&
+ git add binary &&
+ git commit -m "binary blob" &&
+ git format-patch --stdout -m HEAD^ >patch &&
+
+ test_create_repo server &&
+ test_config -C server uploadpack.allowfilter 1 &&
+ test_config -C server uploadpack.allowanysha1inwant 1 &&
+ git clone --filter=blob:none "file://$(pwd)/server" client &&
+ test_when_finished "rm -rf client" &&
+
+ # Exercise to make sure that it works
+ git -C client am ../patch
+'
+
test_done
--
2.28.0.236.gb10cc79966-goog
