Hi Peff, > Le 5 août 2020 à 02:37, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 02:53:30PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: > >> something like adding a remote.<name>.excludeRefs which would allow >> specifying a set of references to exclude from matching the refspec.. >> >> I realize I could customize the refspec to list the set of things I >> want, but then I would miss any potential future branches until I >> updated my remote config again. > > This is definitely a reasonable thing to want, and it has come up off > and on over the years. One search term for the list archive is "negative > refspecs", though it turns up a lot of useless hits when the two words > are not directly adjacent. I tried searching "negative refspecs" (*with* the double quotes) and I get 20 results so it seems to work. Although interestingly it doesn't find this message you wrote I'm responding to because "negative" and "refspec" are on separate lines... I'm CC-ing Eric in case he knows more about this limitation. Philippe.
