"Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> -@@ ref-filter.c: static struct ref_to_worktree_map {
> - struct worktree **worktrees;
> - } ref_to_worktree_map;
> +@@ ref-filter.c: static struct used_atom {
> + enum { O_FULL, O_LENGTH, O_SHORT } option;
> + unsigned int length;
> + } objectname;
> ++ struct email_option {
> ++ enum { EO_RAW, EO_TRIM, EO_LOCALPART } option;
> ++ } email_option;
> + struct refname_atom refname;
> + char *head;
> + } u;
I'll try to find enough time to read the body of the series sometime
later this week, but this interdiff alone smells that this is much
closer to being correct (no, I am not saying I spotted a bug, but it
certainly looks liek it is on the right track, relative to what I
saw the last time, to be right).
A good test for this new feature may be to try using
"<%(authoremail:localpart)> <%(committeremail:trim)>"
as a format to make sure e-mail options are done per-atom.
Thanks.
