Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> In a subsequent patch, a null fetch negotiator will be introduced. This
> negotiator, among other things, will not need any information about
> common objects and will have a NULL known_common. Teach fetch-pack to
> allow this.
Hmph, both the default and the skipping negotiator seem to put NULL
in known_common and add_tip when its next() method is called. Also
they clear known_common to NULL after add_tip is called even once.
So, how have we survived so far without this patch to "allow this
(i.e. known_common method to be NULL)"? Is there something that
makes sure a negotiator never gets called from this function after
its .next or .add_tip method is called?
Puzzled. Or is this merely an optimization? If so, it's not like
the change "allows this", but it starts to take advantage of it in
some way.
... goes and looks at mark_complete_and_common_ref()
The function seems to have an unconditional call to ->known_common(),
so anybody passing a negotiator whose known_common is NULL would
already be segfaulting, so this does not appear to be an optimization
but necessary to keep the code from crashing. I cannot quite tell
if it is avoiding unnecessary work, or sweeping crashes under the
rug, though.
Is the untold assumption that mark_complete_and_common_ref() will
never be called after either mark_tips() or find_common() have been
called?
Thanks.
> [NEEDSWORK]
> Optimizing out the ref iteration also affects the execution
> of everything_local(), which relies on COMPLETE being set. (Having said
> that, the typical use case - lazy fetching - would be fine with
> everything_local() always returning that not everything is local.)
>
> This optimization is needed so that in the future, fetch_pack() can be
> used to lazily fetch in a partial clone (without the no_dependents
> flag). This means that fetch_pack() needs a way to execute without
> relying on any targets of refs being present, and thus it cannot use the
> ref iterator (because it checks and lazy-fetches any missing targets).
> (Git currently does not have this problem because we use the
> no_dependents flag, but lazy-fetching will in a subsequent patch be
> changed to use the user-facing fetch command, which does not use this
> flag.)
> [/NEEDSWORK]
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fetch-pack.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fetch-pack.c b/fetch-pack.c
> index 6c786f5970..5f5474dbed 100644
> --- a/fetch-pack.c
> +++ b/fetch-pack.c
> @@ -677,6 +677,9 @@ static void mark_complete_and_common_ref(struct fetch_negotiator *negotiator,
> int old_save_commit_buffer = save_commit_buffer;
> timestamp_t cutoff = 0;
>
> + if (!negotiator->known_common)
> + return;
> +
> save_commit_buffer = 0;
>
> trace2_region_enter("fetch-pack", "parse_remote_refs_and_find_cutoff", NULL);
