Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] ref-filter: add support for %(contents:size)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Alban and Peff,
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 7:45 PM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 07:37:22PM +0200, Alban Gruin wrote:
>>
>> > > +           # Leave $expect unquoted to lose possible leading whitespaces
>> > > +           echo $expect >expected
>> > > +           test_expect_${4:-sucess} $PREREQ "basic atom: $1 contents:size" '
>> >
>> > There is a typo here, and $expect is written to `expected', but
>> > `test_cmp' wants `expect'.  Fixing those mistakes does not reveal any
>> > broken tests.
>>
>> I thought at first you meant that the typo was s/expected/expect, and
>> wondered how this could possibly have passed. But the typo is
>> s/sucess/success/, so we were in fact not running the test at all (and
>> were generating "test_expect_sucess: not found" messages to stderr, but
>> outside of any test block. Yikes.
>>
>> Thanks for spotting.
>
> Yeah, I copied a suggestion from Junio in the last iteration without
> properly checking it. Sorry about that and thanks for spotting and
> fixing it.

I probably should stop giving "perhaps along the lines of this"
suggestion too lightly and/or when I do not have enough time to
apply and test myself.  Sorry for the gotcha.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux