Re: Avoiding 'master' nomenclature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:17:43AM +0300, lego_12239@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 01:38:56PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > The commit message describes its intent
> > 
> >   commit 489947cee5095b168cbac111ff7bd1eadbbd90dd
> >   Author: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>
> >   Date:   Tue Jun 23 22:33:23 2020 +0000
> > 
> >       fmt-merge-msg: stop treating `master` specially
> > 
> >       In the context of many projects renaming their primary branch names away
> >       from `master`, Git wants to stop treating the `master` branch specially.
> 
> Wow. Jonathan, you are a good student of Goebbels! "many projects" :-D.
> You lie. These are few but very noisy projects. Don't kid youself.

Please keep the tone on the list civil. If you want to disagree, fine,
but "you lie" is inflammatory and unconstructive.

In general, also please keep in mind whether any comments are adding
value to the discussion. In particular:

  - the text you are responding to isn't even Jonathan's; it was a
    quoted commit message to give context.

  - his point is unchanged by whether you agree with "many" in the
    original or not. Focusing on that is just derailing the
    conversation.

  - if you really do want re-open the argument about whether projects
    are interested in changing branch names, it might help to provide
    some actual data. Most of the data-less points (on both sides) have
    already been made in past discussions.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux