Re: Avoiding 'master' nomenclature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 5:29 PM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is an interesting middle ground. I'm a little iffy on it just
> because it complicates the very simple case of "should I mention the
> destination branch",

No, you're absolutely right. After sending that message I went and
looked at how nasty it would be, and it's not worth it.

If we were doing perl or shell or whatever (like the original scripts
were), it would have been trivial. But as things are now, I'll retract
that idea as being overly complicated.

It would solve my "rewrite repo name" thing, but I've solved that with
a hook, and it's a bit hacky, but it's not horrendous or wrong. As you
say, hooks are for special cases, and that hostname rewriting I do is
very much a special case.

             Linus



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux