On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 08:14:42PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > I think this will be matching branch names, not fully qualified refs. > Seems reasonable, but we should be sure to document that. Also, I guess it would see "HEAD" when we're on a detached HEAD. That's slightly ambiguous to match, in that you _could_ have refs/heads/HEAD, but we try to make that hard to do. So it's probably not worth worrying about. -Peff
