Re: Questions about trailer configuration semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anders Waldenborg <anders@xxxxxxx> writes:

> However I guess one alternative implementation would be that if
> trailer.X.something is configured but not trailer.X.key it would work as
> if there was an implicit "trailer.X.key=X" configured. The name of the
> configuration value would specify the correct spelling.

I had the same thought but then a question struck and stopped me:
what should happen if "trailer.X.something" and
"trailer.x.somethingelse" are both defined?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux