Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> for (i = 0; !result && i < num_tasks; i++) {
>> - if (!tasks[i]->enabled)
>> + if (opts.tasks_selected && !tasks[i]->selected)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + if (!opts.tasks_selected && !tasks[i]->enabled)
>> continue;
>
> I am not sure about this. Even if the task <x> is disabled, if the
> user says --task=<x>, it is run anyway? Doesn't make an immediate
> sense to me.
OK, after seeing the title of 12/18, it does make sense. Even if it
is disabled by default, you could still choose to run, which makes
sense.
