Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Anyway, if we move to "v1" as the default for "git init" anyway, then > the number of people being helped would become much smaller. Yup. So in that sense I do not think I care too deeply either way. >> > My preference would be to move forward in 2.28 with the first two >> > patches in that topic branch (i.e., *not* the third yet), since they >> > don't produce any user facing behavior that would create danger for >> > users or clash with this plan. >> >> Yup, I agree. I'd give another name to the third commit and then >> rewind jn/v0-with-extensions-fix by one to prevent mistakes from >> happening. Thanks. > > OK. I was confused to see it still at the tip in the latest What's > Cooking, but I think we're just crossing emails. :) Yes.
