Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I can fix this specific instance here (which is what I think you > want), for this commit to practice what it preaches. At the same time > there are probably about 100 or so other places where the tests check > the file system directly for ref(log) existence, so it would never be > totally consistent. > > The only way to systematically find the offending places is to > introduce a new ref backend and then fix all the tests, and I think > that goes outside the scope of this small series. Good. I think we are on the same page. I suggested to make the patch internally consistent, nothing more. And fixing everything in the world is outside the scope of these two patches. Thanks.
