On 7/7/2020 1:57 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * ds/commit-graph-bloom-updates (2020-07-01) 10 commits > (merged to 'next' on 2020-07-06 at 177e6b362e) > + commit-graph: check all leading directories in changed path Bloom filters > + revision: empty pathspecs should not use Bloom filters > + revision.c: fix whitespace > + commit-graph: check chunk sizes after writing > + commit-graph: simplify chunk writes into loop > + commit-graph: unify the signatures of all write_graph_chunk_*() functions > + commit-graph: persist existence of changed-paths > + bloom: fix logic in get_bloom_filter() > + commit-graph: change test to die on parse, not load > + commit-graph: place bloom_settings in context > (this branch uses sg/commit-graph-cleanups.) > > Updates to the changed-paths bloom filter. > > Will merge to 'master'. > > * sg/commit-graph-cleanups (2020-06-08) 10 commits > + commit-graph: simplify write_commit_graph_file() #2 > + commit-graph: simplify write_commit_graph_file() #1 > + commit-graph: simplify parse_commit_graph() #2 > + commit-graph: simplify parse_commit_graph() #1 > + commit-graph: clean up #includes > + diff.h: drop diff_tree_oid() & friends' return value > + commit-slab: add a function to deep free entries on the slab > + commit-graph-format.txt: all multi-byte numbers are in network byte order > + commit-graph: fix parsing the Chunk Lookup table > + tree-walk.c: don't match submodule entries for 'submod/anything' > (this branch is used by ds/commit-graph-bloom-updates.) > > The changed-path Bloom filter is improved using ideas from an > independent implementation. > > Under review. > cf. <20200627155610.GN2898@xxxxxxxxxx> > cf. <20200627163335.GO2898@xxxxxxxxxx> > cf. <20200627155348.GM2898@xxxxxxxxxx> I see these are both in 'next' (thanks!). Perhaps the "Under review" status for sg/commit-graph-cleanups should be modified to match ds/commit-graph-bloom-updates? Thanks, -Stolee
