On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 18:50:05 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > True, as Dscho also mentioned. I'll just do "b914084007" => > "ee4512ed48 and b914084007" while queueing. I noticed that I was missing a word in the message, and I'm sending a new patch with a better commit message for the second commit, so I'll update this in the first commit and send a new patchset. > > A test would be nice, but I don't think it's very feasible for the same > > reason mentioned in 46df6906f3. Yeah, I don't think I have a good enough grasp of how to test this, and I saw that there wasn't any existing tests for it, so that's why I dropped it. -- Trygve Aaberge
