Re: Terminology question about remote branches.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, David Kastrup wrote:

Julian Phillips <julian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
We would need an official terminology for it.

Following was mentioned earlier in this thread ... could we use that?

tracking branch:
  ref always points at a commit from the remote repo branch

following branch:
  ref either points at a commit from the remote repo branch, or a
  local commit with a commit from the remote repo branch in the history

perhaps?

An auto-merging branch?  The term is somewhat more technical so that
people are less likely to think it just a colloquial alternative
expression for "tracking".

Personally I don't like auto-merging as it doesn't have any connotations of _what_ is auto-merged ... and it's not really an automatic merge anyway, you have to ask for it (by running pull).

--
Julian

 ---
Don't look back, the lemmings are gaining on you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux