Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > Thank you for those references. I did try to make sure that b914084007 > would not regress on anything, but apparently I failed to verify the final > form. Since all it did was to remove `#if 0`...`#endif` guards, it was > unfortunately quite easy for this regression to slip in. Yeah, I recall wondering why it was safe to suddenly enable the segment of the disabled code all of sudden.
