Re: [PATCH v12 5/5] read-cache: speed up has_dir_name (part 2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> +				 * last: xxx/yy-file (because '-' sorts before '/')
>> +				 * this: xxx/yy/abc
>
> This is problematic, because the index can already contain 'xxx/yy' as
> a file, when adding 'xxx/yy/abc', but since 'xxx/yy' as a file sorts
> before 'xxx/yy-file', the short-circuiting here doesn't see it and
> thus leaves the d-f collision undetected.  Consequently, even Git
> porcelain commands can create tree objects with duplicate entries, as
> demonstrated in the tests below.

Yeah, the "optimization" is quite bogus.  Thanks for catching it.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux