Re: [PATCH 2/2] git clone: don't clone into non-empty directory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01-07-2020 18:10, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 5:46 AM Ben Wijen <ben@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> "git init --separate-git-dir=" checks only whether the path exists,
> and errors out if it does; it doesn't care whether the directory is
> empty or not. I'm wondering, therefore, if this check should be
> tightened to more closely align the behavior of the two commands.
> (Using the tighter semantic now doesn't prohibit loosening it in the
> future, whereas it's harder to tighten behavior which started out
> loose.)
> 

About `git init`, I did take a look at it, but saw 'exist_ok' is always
true when called from 'cmd_init_db' (see builtin/init_db.c:654)
This means `git init` always allows when git_dir/real_git_dir already exists,
which I understand for the worktree, but I doubt if one wants this for the
repository. (when --separate-git-dir is used)

Also, because 'exist_ok' is always true for `git init` and - with this patch -
`git clone` checks the git_dir/real_git_dir before the 'init_db' call I'm wondering if
the code in 'init_db' (builtin/init-db.c:394-400) can be removed. 

Then, even if we do take that route (no 'is_empty_dir', only 'path_exists') we must
also address junk_git_dir_flags, as REMOVE_DIR_KEEP_TOPLEVEL would invalidate
a second git clone.

So, as this patch only fixes the problem at hand, IMHO separate patch-sets should
be created for mentioned issues.

Ben...



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux