Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)
From: Whinis <Whinis@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:16:40 -0400
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, simon@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAAOnFsNUB_+NZMGnu2yasL8tk_KTfqPY6JiHOpvYHiyY_Lytrw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAOnFsNUB_+NZMGnu2yasL8tk_KTfqPY6JiHOpvYHiyY_Lytrw@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0

Excellent post but I think your post also missed one other possibledownside. Excluding developers afraid of politics becoming moreimportant than technical development in projects just as many developersdid and left python after their change.

References:
- Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)
  - From: Gunnar Liljas

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] remote: use the configured default branch name when appropriate
Next by Date: [PATCH 0/2] bugreport: report configs from safelist
Previous by thread: Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)
Next by thread: Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux