Hi Junio & Danh, On Tue, 23 Jun 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On 2020-06-23 15:04:13+0000, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> diff --git a/Documentation/git-ls-remote.txt b/Documentation/git-ls-remote.txt > >> index 0a5c8b7d493..492e573856f 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/git-ls-remote.txt > >> +++ b/Documentation/git-ls-remote.txt > >> @@ -101,9 +101,9 @@ f25a265a342aed6041ab0cc484224d9ca54b6f41 refs/tags/v0.99.1 > >> 7ceca275d047c90c0c7d5afb13ab97efdf51bd6e refs/tags/v0.99.3 > >> c5db5456ae3b0873fc659c19fafdde22313cc441 refs/tags/v0.99.2 > >> 0918385dbd9656cab0d1d81ba7453d49bbc16250 refs/tags/junio-gpg-pub > >> -$ git ls-remote http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git master pu rc > >> +$ git ls-remote http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git master seen rc > > > > rc is not with us anymore. > > > > Should we replace it with next, too? > > I do not think so. I think we never had 'rc'. Indeed, and the context given in the patch demonstrates that no `rc` is shown, so I assumed the same things as Junio explained here: > I think what the above example is demonstrating is this. > > SYNOPSIS calls the last command line arguments <refs>; they are > actually mere patterns (which is how these command line > arguments are described in the documentation). It is *not* an > error if no refs match a particular pattern. > > And because we have no refs that match the pattern "rc", we only see > "master" and "pu" (now "seen") from the command. Precisely. > I see a couple of possible improvements here: > > - The "<refs>...::" documentation should explain what kind of > pattern match is performed here. I recall these originally were > just tail matches, but the rule might have been made more > flexible over time. > > - The example should first explain the setting. The first sample > depends on the current (./.) repository having these tags or it > would not work (showing the sample upfront and explaining the > outcome shown in the sample would work well in this case, > e.g. "we can see that in the current repository, there are tags > X, Y and Z"). The second one at least needs to say two things: > the sample repository does not have a branch called 'rc' and that > is why it is not shown, and it is not an error for patterns to > produce no match. Those sound like wonderful #leftoverbits to me. Thank you, Dscho > > Thanks. > > > > >> 5fe978a5381f1fbad26a80e682ddd2a401966740 refs/heads/master > >> -c781a84b5204fb294c9ccc79f8b3baceeb32c061 refs/heads/pu > >> +c781a84b5204fb294c9ccc79f8b3baceeb32c061 refs/heads/seen > >> $ git remote add korg http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git > >> $ git ls-remote --tags korg v\* > >> d6602ec5194c87b0fc87103ca4d67251c76f233a refs/tags/v0.99 >
