From: John Lin <johnlinp@xxxxxxxxx> Sometimes git would suggest the user to run `git prune` when there are too many unreachable loose objects. It's more user-friendly if we add git-prune into bash completion. Signed-off-by: John Lin <johnlinp@xxxxxxxxx> --- bash-completion: add git-prune into bash completion Sometimes git would suggest the user to run git prune when there are too many unreachable loose objects. It's more user-friendly if we add git-prune into bash completion. Signed-off-by: John Lin johnlinp@xxxxxxxxx [johnlinp@xxxxxxxxx] Fixes #642. Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-667%2Fjohnlinp%2Fadd-git-prune-bash-completion-v1 Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-667/johnlinp/add-git-prune-bash-completion-v1 Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/667 command-list.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/command-list.txt b/command-list.txt index cbb960c8436..89aa60cde7e 100644 --- a/command-list.txt +++ b/command-list.txt @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ git-pack-redundant plumbinginterrogators git-pack-refs ancillarymanipulators git-parse-remote synchelpers git-patch-id purehelpers -git-prune ancillarymanipulators +git-prune ancillarymanipulators complete git-prune-packed plumbingmanipulators git-pull mainporcelain remote git-push mainporcelain remote base-commit: 101b3204f37606972b40fc17dec84560c22f69f6 -- gitgitgadget