"brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The patches are ordered roughly with test-only fixes, then SVN, and then
> CVS. There are no additional tests here because everything fails with
> SHA-256 before and passes afterwards.
Thanks brian. I took a quick look at this series (including the
CVS stuff) and nothing objectionable jumped out(*).
Consider this series Acked-by: me
(*) except perhaps some of my original code :x
which I hope to fix at some point this year
