Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Or we could change the lookup side to use the value of the ref
>> itself when asked for @{0}, and use the "old" side of the only entry
>> when asked for @{1}. That way, we do not need to play games with an
>> artificial entry at all, which may be a better solution.
>
> Or more generally, use the old side from @{n} when asked for @{n+1} when
> there are only n entries in the reflog.
Yup, I agree that it is the natural consequence.
