Re: [PATCH 3/3] branch: don't mix --edit-description

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> `git branch` accepts `--edit-description` in conjunction with other
> arguments. However, `--edit-description` is its own mode, similar to
> `--set-upstream-to`, which is also made mutually exclusive with other
> modes. Prevent `--edit-description` from being mixed with other modes.

Makes sense.  Do we have some "these options are mutually exclusive"
test?

It makes me wonder if this can/should be switched to OPT_CMDMODE()
so that we do not have to write this if statement in the first
place.


> Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  builtin/branch.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/branch.c b/builtin/branch.c
> index accb61b1aa..99633ad004 100644
> --- a/builtin/branch.c
> +++ b/builtin/branch.c
> @@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ int cmd_branch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  		list = 1;
>  
>  	if (!!delete + !!rename + !!copy + !!new_upstream + !!show_current +
> -	    list + unset_upstream > 1)
> +	    list + edit_description + unset_upstream > 1)
>  		usage_with_options(builtin_branch_usage, options);
>  
>  	if (filter.abbrev == -1)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux