Hi, On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I wonder if it would help us to catch similar breakages if we change > git.c::run_command() so that we do not pass prefix (or pass a bogus > pointer ((const char *)1)) for commands that do not ask for > NEED_WORK_TREE. I tried that, but we have some places where we ask "if (prefix && *prefix)", for example in ls-tree. It does not _require_ a work tree, but it certainly uses it when it is available -- which is fine. Other users are more tricky, such as ls-files and update-index, which need a working tree only in some cases. I'll probably write a patch on Monday (if nobody else is faster) to provide a function "require_work_tree()" in environment.c, which does the obvious (with caching). Then comes the tedious part: identifying all those options that need a working tree... Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
