Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)
- From: Sérgio Augusto Vianna <sergio.a.vianna@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:24:05 -0300
- Cc: Whinis@xxxxxxxxxx, alexsmith@xxxxxxxxx, don@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gitster@xxxxxxxxx, sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sergio.a.vianna@xxxxxxxxx, simon@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20200616133054.2caiwqwp5mlmb54a@chatter.i7.local>
- References: <20200616133054.2caiwqwp5mlmb54a@chatter.i7.local>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0
>Let's leave emotionally charged rhetoric and discuss this like
reasonable human beings.
Oh, now we put emotions aside? This whole thing started because white
people FELT like black people FELT offended by the word "master" on it's
own. But if that's the case, I'll just argue there is no need to avoid
the word master at all. After all, feeling aside, right?
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel Development]
[Gcc Help]
[IETF Annouce]
[DCCP]
[Netdev]
[Networking]
[Security]
[V4L]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Fedora Users]