Re: Terminology question about remote branches.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Julian Phillips <julian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> "Lars Hjemli" <lh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> The magic setup that makes this happen is the following lines in .git/config:
>> It would be helpful.  Except that nothing whatsoever can be found in
>> .git/config concerning my local and my remote tracking branches.  So
>> where is that information _really_ hidden away?
>
>> What gives?
>
> It would appear that your repo was created with an old version of
> git. Which also explains why you were talking about origin as a
> branch - which it used to be (a real local branch too ...), rather
> than as a remote - which it is now.
>
> The whole remotes/tracking mechanism changed in 1.5.0 - now it's
> much more flexible (and probably more complicated too).

I think I am going to cry.  So I need to rebase my branches, pull out
the resulting patch sets, scrap my repository, clone it new from
upstream, reapply my branches, in order to have a system where the
documentation is somewhat in synch with the actual behavior?

[...]

No, it would seem that I can just
git-clone -l
my repository and be set up in the new order of things.  Nice.

However, it would appear from my experiments up to now that the
--track option _can't_ be made to work with a 1.4 repository.  I think
that is worth mentioning in the docs.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux