Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > As I said already, I personally do not think that this needs to be a > preparatory patch to anonymize 'master' that cannot be configured to > something else into 'ref0'. This will become necessary when we make > the primary branch configurable, so I think it is easier to replace > the counterpart to your [PATCH 8/9] in the original series with it > in the v2 series. Ah, I forgot to say, if you think it is easier to manage the main set of patches for the topic to eject as much preparatory changes as possible, I do not at all mind treating this as one of the preparatory step and queue it separately, making the main series depend on it. I just wanted to say that it is not necessary, even though it does not hurt. > Regarding the update to the comment before this "special case", I > would suggest to explain "why" not just "what". > > Thanks.
