Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 6/11/2020 7:59 AM, Don Goodman-Wilson wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 1:52 PM Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Indeed, the flexibility to choose the name of the default branch can be
>>> helpful for projects with specific naming, especially non-english
>>> speaking projects.
>>>
>>> To that end I would suggest adding -b argument to git init to be able to
>>> choose the default branch name per project. This should select the
>>> initial branch name and also write the it as the default branch name in
>>> the repo configuration (if git continues to treat the default branch
>>> specially).
>>>
>>> This can be used in documentation to use the new name immediately
>>> without breaking existing workflows that rely on the 'master' branch.
>> 
>> I _really_ like this idea (and your reasoning). Seconded.
>
> Yes, adding a -b|--branch option would be an excellent addition to
> the config option.

In the ideal world, users should be able to just set
init.defaultBranchName in ~/.gitconfig once and forget about it.
But it is expected that some projects and their tools may heavily
depend on the assumption that the primary branch is called 'master'.
Giving a command line override like "init -b" (and do not forget to
do the same for "clone" as necessary) is a good escape hatch for
members of such projects.

Good.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux