Hi Matt, On Wed, 10 Jun 2020, Matt Rogers wrote: > > - * We also leave "master" as a special case, since it does not reveal > > - * anything interesting. > > + * We also leave the default branch name as a special case, since it > > + * does not reveal anything interesting. > > */ > I feel this is a weird thing to do, since you're trying to anonymize the branch > name,and now the default branch is identifiable with your config file. For > example, if the default branch contains the name of my project/repo then this > sounds like a recipe for accidentally sharing it. I feel a better > alternative would > be to exclude nothing from the anonymization or the proposed default default > branch name I don't think that the name of the main branch should be subject to anonymizing, whether it be `master` or anything else. Ciao, Dscho
