"brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 2020-06-10 at 23:36:30, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * bc/sha-256-part-2 (2020-05-27) 44 commits >> ... >> - t1050: match object ID paths in a hash-insensitive way >> >> SHA-256 migration work continues. > > I assume you're waiting for something on this, and it's probably a > review, but I didn't see a comment to that effect. Am I correct? More or less. It actually is weaker; I didn't have enough energy to give attention to the topic between issue #1 and issue #2 this month to even bother adding such a comment. By default nothing happens without input, and I try not to be the only reviewer of a large topic like this one---I always prefer to have second sets of eyes. Thanks for working on it. A large refactoring like this one, the sooner we can absorb it, the less blocking it would be for other topics in flight.
