On 2020-06-10 at 21:30:31, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Based on the above-mentioned patch series, I have an end-to-end > proof-of-concept (with one or two monster patches that still need to be > split up) to change the default branch name to `main`. It is complete in > the sense that it passes the test suite (also in SHA-256 mode when merging > the `bk/transition-stage-4` branch), but it has a couple of too-large > commits that still need to be split up: > https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/655 I appreciate you working on these patches and also your consideration for the SHA-256 work. > Or maybe there are a couple more natural seams at which to partition > those patches better, to improve reviewability (and to reduce > reviewer fatigue). I think if you can split out the automated portions into their own patches, then it will be easier to review. It sounds like you're already planning on doing that, so I don't have many other suggestions. I look forward to seeing the patches. > So let me make my intentions clear: I do care about inclusive language, > and even more so about inclusive culture, and I would like Git to be > changed accordingly. Thank you for saying this. I agree wholeheartedly, and I feel very strongly that the words we use matter. > Tentatively, I would like to propose having this meeting in the coming > week, via Zoom, just like we did the Virtual Contributor Summit last > September. > > Could I ask all interested parties to reply to this email? I'm interested in participating as well. -- brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
