Re: [PATCH v1] builtin/checkout.c: replace bit-shift values for macros in call to check_stages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] builtin/checkout.c: replace bit-shift values for macros in call to check_stages
From: Edmundo Carmona Antoranz <eantoranz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 23:15:08 -0600
Cc: Git List <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <xmqqwo4ggfb5.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
References: <20200607054849.1014185-1-eantoranz@gmail.com> <xmqqwo4ggfb5.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>

On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 2:22 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The patch does not make sense.  The hardcoded numbers you touched
> have nothing to do with these macros.
>

Totally misguided myself. Sorry for the confusion.

References:
- [PATCH v1] builtin/checkout.c: replace bit-shift values for macros in call to check_stages
  - From: Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
- Re: [PATCH v1] builtin/checkout.c: replace bit-shift values for macros in call to check_stages
  - From: Junio C Hamano

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] builtin/worktree.c: fix a sparse '0 as NULL pointer' warning
Next by Date: Re: git stash --include-untracked walks ignored directories
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1] builtin/checkout.c: replace bit-shift values for macros in call to check_stages
Next by thread: [GSoC] Week 4 Blog
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux