Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Simon Pieters <simon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Junio,
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:02 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Simon Pieters <simon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > If someone is interested in helping with this, please follow up with
>> > Don. But I would like to ask again for git mainline to seriously
>> > consider adopting this change, given the information presented above
>> > and the ongoing movement against systemic racism.
>>
>> I am OK in principle if a future version of Git, when used by a new
>> user of Git who does not have any custom configuration, wrote a
>> string other than 'master' in .git/HEAD when "git init" is run.
>>
>> Picking a good replacement word to mean the primary branch is
>> tricky, though.  Just having a notion that one is special among
>> many (i.e. the primary-ness of the thing being named with a word
>> that will replace 'master') may already be offending to some folks.
>
> I find this response not satisfactory:

And I find that response quite offensive.

I am not saying that there is any good replacement word, or there
shouldn't be one, or we shouldn't look for it.  If we can come up
with a single replacement word and everybody can agree on it, that
would be great.

I am just cautioning you that we may not be able to reach a single
word as a concensus, and you should plan with the possibility in
mind.

In any case, I wasn't responding to satisfy just you in particular
anyway ;-)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux