Re: [PATCH 0/2] t5318: test '--stdin-commits' with '--[no-]progress'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/1/2020 2:01 PM, Taylor Blau wrote:
> Here's a short pair of patches that I wrote this morning after looking
> at Stolee's most recent coverage report.
> 
> The first patch is just cleanup, and the second patch is the real
> change. It would have been nice to parameterize these tests over the
> arguments to 'git commit graph' (ie., have three tests for 'write',
> 'verify', and 'write --stdin-commits'), but '--stdin-commits' is special
> since it requires input.
> 
> These patches are based off the tip of 'next', but really only need my
> changes from 'tb/commit-graph-no-check-oids'.

The first patch is an obviously good patch, and it even has a good
justification in the message.

The second is also good. The case of forcing "--progress" would be
enough for covering your new-ish progress meter. Perhaps the other
tests (or at least the one specifying "--no-progress") could be
removed, but I don't feel strongly about that.

Thanks,
-Stolee



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux