Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> The real question is, do we consider the >> existing "git gc" infrastructure such a lost cause that we should >> touch it as little as possible? > > I am fine with that, as long as the "new" thing will take over what > "git gc" currently does. Good reminder, thank you. Yes, as long as we end up replacing the old thing, making a parallel new thing (e.g. with a config option for switching between during a transition period) can be a fine approach. Thanks, Jonathan
