Hello, Andy! On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 19:14 +0100, Andy Parkins wrote: > On Friday 2007, August 03, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > > I don't suggest that StGIT gives up on the git-based storage, but this > > mode of operation could be implemented in two ways. > > git's shiny new git rebase -i has removed, for me, those times when I needed > stgit. Perhaps those who've move from git to quilt would try again when > 1.5.3 is out with the magic that is "rebase -i". I don't understand how one option can replace StGIT. I assume you were trying to avoid StGIT already, and "git-rebase -i" was just the last missing piece. It would be great if you could tell me how your approach would deal with the issue of editable patches I mentioned already. In case I was unclear, here's the quote from one of the developers: [quote] Sometimes, I just make patches in quilt, then I do "quilt refresh", "quilt pop -a", "cd patches" and modify the patches and series file manually, e.g. by moving one patch from one file into the other. The "cd ..", "quilt push -a" and off I am. That the "database" of quilt is in a known format and I can hack on it with an editor is a plus for me :-) [end of quote] -- Regards, Pavel Roskin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
